Daniel's thoughts

Hebrews 6:19. "We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure."

My Photo
Name:
Location: La Junta, CO, United States

I am originally from Western Nebraska. My beautiful wife’s name is Shelley. We have two kids. Our daughter’s name is Mae. Our son is Noah. I am a graduate of Moody Bible Institute and Wheaton Grad School. I blog on Biblical theology and exegesis. I’m a youth pastor in Eastern Colorado.

Thursday, December 29, 2005

Christmas

This Christmas season has gone so quickly this year. Shelley and I went down to Scottsbluff, Nebraska for a couple of days to hang out with my family. That was pretty cool. I played a lot of chess with the family and won most of the games I played. My sister Sarah beat me once. Smart kid. She brought her boyfriend Brandon from Bible school home with her. That's kinda scary. I didn't realize that they were that serious. My parents really like him so that's cool. He was a pretty cool guy. He let me beat him at chess a bunch. I really enjoyed the time with my family.

Then, we went to spend several days with Shelley's family in Lake George, Colorado. That's where I'm at now. We've had a great time. Shelley's dad and I watched the Huskers take out Michigan last night in the Alamo Bowl. There's still hope for the HuskerNation. Just wait till next year. Shelley's dad Randy is an Ohio State fan so at least in this game we had something in common. I was going for the Huskers and he just hates Michigan. Man, if only these two schools could have played in 1997. That would have been a game. And it would have settled a lot of debate. Scott Frost and the crew would have took 'um. I'm positive. Stupid Big Ten! Why couldn't you have joined the BCS earlier?

Well, I'm really enjoying vacation, but it will be good to be back.

Friday, December 23, 2005

Romans 9

Last April I started a series on Romans 9. Here is what I've written on it so far.

Part One
Part Two
Part Three

I hope to write more on Romans 9 some time soon.

Ephesians

Since I've been memorizing Ephesians for the last couple of months, I thought that I might blog out some of my thoughts on the book.

When studying any book of the Bible, it's probably best to figure out why it was written. If we understand the author's purpose in writing, we'll have a better understanding of each paragraph. From my study, I have identified 3:1-6 as the thesis statement for the letter. I think that here Paul spells out his reasons for writing.

"1For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles—

2Surely you have heard about the administration of God's grace that was given to me for you, 3that is, the mystery made known to me by revelation, as I have already written briefly. 4In reading this, then, you will be able to understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, 5which was not made known to men in other generations as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to God's holy apostles and prophets. 6This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus."

In the phases "in reading this" and "as I have already written briefly" lead me to the conclusion that this is the thesis statement for the letter. Paul's intention for his audience is that in reading this letter, they would understand the mystery of Christ. And what was this mystery? That through the gospel the Gentiles were heirs, members, and sharers together with the Jews.

This message, or "mystery" as Paul calls it, was new information. It was a brand new revelation from God. In the past, OT times, the Jews were God's favored people. If a Gentile wanted to be a part of God's chosen people, he needed to take on the identity marks of the Jews: circumcision, certain regulations on your diet, the observance of the law.

However, something had radically changed. God had given new information. The Holy Spirit had revealed this information to the apostles and the NT prophets. This was exciting information for Gentiles. Through the gospel of Jesus Christ, they were being included into God's promised blessings.

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Blessings in the Elect One

In a recent comment, Andrew asked me, "If election is conditional (rather than unconditional), then what is it conditioned upon?"

Here's a real brief explanation of my understanding of the "election" language in Paul's writings.
  • Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the Abrahamic covenant. "The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say 'and to seeds,' meaning many people, but 'and to your seed,' meaning one person, who is Christ" (Gal. 3:16). All of the blessings God promised Abraham belong to Jesus Christ.
  • If you want the blessings promised to Abraham, you must be in Christ. "You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise" (Gal. 3:26-29). To benefit from the blessings that God promised Abraham, you must believe in Christ. In other words, we become the seed of Abraham when we believe in the Seed of Abraham.
  • Since Jesus is the heir to the blessings that God promised Abraham, He is the elect one. "Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ." Every spiritual blessing that God has promised belongs to Jesus Christ. The word "blessing" used here should cue us in that Paul is alluding to the Abrahamic covenant. Jesus is the chosen one, the seed of Abraham, and heir of the Abrahamic blessings.
  • Notice that in Paul's thesis statement for Ephesians, he mentions the promise that God made Abraham. "This mystery is that through the gospel, the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus" (Eph. 3:6). Thus, the theme of the letter is that Jews and Gentiles both share in the promise that God made to Abraham. If I am correct in identifying 3:1-6 as the thesis, then we should expect to see this theme developed in every pericope. I would like to suggest that the theme of 1:3-14 is praise to God for His blessings that Jews and Gentiles share in Christ.
  • We are elect when we believe in Jesus Christ. "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God's possession—to the praise of his glory" (1:13-14) Notice the shift in the pronouns. Throughout 1:3-12, Paul uses 1st person plural pronouns. In v. 13-14, he starts using 2nd person plural pronouns. What does this mean? Based of the theme of the letter (3:1-6), the 1st person pronouns probably refer to Jews while the 2nd person pronouns refer to Gentiles. Thus, the point is that the Gentiles were included in Christ when they believed the word of truth. When someone is joined to Christ, God's chosen one, he is now a part of God's chosen people.
This is a brief overall of my position on election. If you have any questions, I can address the subject in more detail.

Monday, December 19, 2005

Unconditional Election

I just don't get the attraction to it. Why is Calvinism so popular today? The other day I saw a comment that Antonio left on a blog that made me do some thinking. The doctrine of unconditional election naturally implies the doctrine of unconditional reprobation. If God decreed to save some folks based on nothing within the individual, then logically God must have decreed to condemn the rest of the bunch based on nothing with the individual. Thus, in the Calvinist scheme the main reason that people go to hell is because God unconditionally elected them to be condemned. They sin because God willed it. And they go to hell because God willed it. Worst of all, it was unconditional. I know that Calvinists might think that they are being misrepresented, but this is the logical outcome of a doctrine such as double predestination.

Bummer

This weekend has been a real bummer. First, Shelley has been looking forward to buying a digital camera for a long time. Last week we finally bought one and she's been all excited about it. Well, last night at middle school youth group it turned up missing. We were kinda suspicious that someone might have stolen it. I really hope that's not the case. We've looked all over and can't find. Please pray that it would turn up. Secondly, last night our furnace broke. Now we're waiting for someone to come to fix it. I don't know. I'm just really bummed about the camera. It was a lot of money for us to spend on something. God willing, it will show up.

Saturday, December 17, 2005

"Nearly Parallel Truths"?

Check this out. Philip Johnson gives Spurgeon's explanation of divine sovereignty and human responsibility.

He says that these twin truths are not a parodox or mystery; but rather "nearly parallel truths." It sounds like double talk to me. Call it what you want; you still do the same thing. The end result is that you have avoided the question.

The Calvinist worldview has no good reason for believing in human responsibility. The Calvinist knows that the Bible teaches human responsibility, and yet his worldview does not have the philosophical means to sustain a robust view of human responsibility.

Friday, December 16, 2005

Sons of God in Genesis 6

So we're going through Genesis with our high school youth group. Next week we're covering Noah's ark and the flood. One interesting side issue when it comes to Genesis 6 is the identity of the "sons of God." It's just a nagging question for most folk when reading the story. I'm tempted to not even bring it up in my lesson. I might decide to just start with verse 5.

Since there are three major views on the text, I was kinda curious about what position that you all hold. So what is it? Angels? Wicked rulers? The Sethites? My Genesis prof at Frontier was completely sold on the angels view. However, I now kinda lean toward the wicked rulers interpretation. John Walton teaches this view in his Genesis commentary. What do you think?

Monday, December 12, 2005

Intelligent Design

Recently in our High-School youth ministry, we've been studying the book of Genesis. As a result, the whole evolution debate comes up. I found this article on ID written by Denver Seminary prof Doug Groothuis in The Rocky Mountain News. He brings up some interesting points.

The Lion, the Witch, and Wardrobe

So I went to Narnia this weekend. Not the movie, the place. Just kidding. I liked it but I was a little disappointed. I guess that was because I expected it to be a very moving experience just like the LOTR was. After watching it, I realize that one of main reasons that I enjoyed the books was because of C.S. Lewis' prose. His narration is captivating and you just don't get that in the movie. Lewis was a masterful communicator and his ability to illustrate was powerful. That's what I missed most about the movie. Maybe they should have had a narrator. I don't know. Maybe it's just the curse of Disney. I bet that's it.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

The Gospel is God

Dr. John H. Walton, an OT prof at Wheaton, writes in his Genesis NIVAC volume,

"What does our salvation cost us? Nothing. What does our faith cost us? Everything. We are saved by grace alone, but as Christians we live by faith. I suggest that we must be defined not by our salvation but by our faith. The 'Lordship Salvation' debate is frustrating because sometimes proponents on both sides make it sound as if 'salvation' is the reason for our faith. That cannot be right. Salvation is a benefit of our faith gained by the grace of God; God is the reason for our faith. It is foolish to dwell on whether we have to live a responsive life of faith in order to go to heaven. When will we realize how less important heaven is than God? How can we possibly feel good about gaining heaven if in the process we do not give ourselves to God? For some, eternality is nothing more than a selfish pursuit born of a fear of death or hell, and living for God is too much trouble. Let us hope that God does not grant their wish by leaving them alone. If he did, they would find to their dismay that if heaven were filled only with themselves, it would little better than hell."

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

The Cost of Discipleship

Dietrich Bonhoeffer writes in his classic The Cost of Discipleship, "Cheap grace is the grace we bestow on ourselves...the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, communion without confession. Cheap grace is grace withouth discipleship....[Grace] is costly because it costs a man his life, and it is grace because it gives a man the only true life."

Monday, December 05, 2005

Check This Stuff Out

O.k. I thought this stuff was kinda funny. I haven't gotten too much into the Emergent church debate. Since it's hard to define what the Emergent church/movement/conversation actually is, it's hard for me to know even how to discuss it, let alone argue about it. However, I saw this recently and it cracked me up. These pictures will let you know if you're Pro-Emergent or Anti-Emergent.

Oh, and by the way, this was also pretty interesting. Dan Kimball thinks that the Da Vinci movie will provide better witnessing opportunities than the Narnia movie. Living in a college town, I totally think that he nailed this. Already I've talked to several folks about historical questions about Christ because of the novel.

Friday, December 02, 2005

My Top Reasons for NOT Being a Calvinist

Julianne, over at Semper Reformanda, and Chris, over at Imperishable Inheritance, posted their Top Reasons for Being a Calvinist. Wanting to be like everyone else, I decided to make a list. Don't get too worked up here. Part of this is just in jest.

1. Spurgeon was a fat, topical preacher.

2. My best thoughts about God come from Romans and Isaiah.

3. Three words: William Lane Craig

4. God is not a Calvinist.

5. I bring up Scripture passages that make Calvinists cring (Hebrews 6 anyone?)

6. Calvinism is just a current fad. It will go out in a couple of years.

7. I notice that there were 16 centuries of church history before the Reformation.

8. William Cowper wrestled major depression wondering if he was elect or not.

9. I read the Bible.

10. C.S. Lewis and John Welsey were also Christian Hedonists.

The Justice of God in Destroying the Canaanites

Is God unjust? Today many folks often seem to think so. Skeptics complain that the God of the Old Testament is harsh and capricious. In doing so, they cast doubt on the validity of Scripture. The biblical God frequently stands in stark contrast to the God of popular opinion. We like to think that God is just a kind old man with a long white beard, who sits in heaven wringing His hands with worry, uncertain of how to deal with the ills of humanity. Our mental image of God needs refocused. We need to reexamine the Bible to develop a better, fuller understanding of God. This God is much bigger than we could ever imagine. We cannot tame Him. We cannot make Him fit into our narrow modern box. We must see Him for who He really is.

One of the most problematic areas of Scripture that modern critics have used to cast doubt on the Bible is found in the Old Testament book of Joshua. Joshua describes the Israelite conquest of the land of Canaan. In Joshua, God gives his people several great victories over the area enemy nations. Here they carry out the ban that God gave the Israelites in the book of Deuteronomy. Through Moses, God told the children of Israel to utterly destroy these nations—to show them no mercy. This resounds with unfairness to our modern ears. In the 20th century, we witnessed several genocides in Germany, Rwanda, and Bosnia. It rings hollow to us that a loving, just God would ever command such a brutal destructive means of warfare.

The Main Question

For those for us who accept the Bible as an accurate revelation of God’s character, we must wrestle with the justness of such a command. Is God righteous in commanding and authorizing the nation of Israel to completely destroy the Canaanite people? Or is such a command unfair? To answer this question, we must examine the command in Deuteronomy to see why God is commanding the destruction of the Canaanites and His purposes in his actions toward Israel.

The Command

What exactly did God command the Israelites to do in the book of Deuteronomy? The term “Deuteronomy” comes from two different Greek words that literally mean “second law.” Deuteronomy is the second giving of the Mosiac Law for a new generation. In the book of Exodus, God miraculously delivers Israel from the bondage of slavery in Egypt. Then Moses guides this new infant nation through the wilderness to the foothills of Mt. Sinai. There God gives them the Law, a revelation of God’s character. From there, Moses led the people to the very edge of the Promised Land, Canaan. And here, they fail. They get the report from the spies. They hear that there are giants in the land. They decided that they cannot do it. They turn around and they wander in the desert for forty years. And God says that no one from that generation could enter the Promised Land. Forty years takes place. Everyone from that generation dies. Here is where the book of Deuteronomy comes in. Moses delivers the Law to a new generation that will be faithful to God’s Word.

Moses says:

When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you—and when the LORD your has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally (Deut. 7:1-2a NIV).

These nations were made-up of smaller city-states which were located all throughout modern day Palestine. Each of one of them was polytheistic. Most of them worshiped a god named Baal, who had a wife, the goddess Asherah. Since Baal and Asherah were fertility gods, worship of Baal was very sexual and very immoral. From Leviticus 18, we learn that the Canaanite religion involved homosexuality, incest, bestiality, and even child sacrifice. What we have here is a pagan, wicked, corrupt culture that had taken complete control of the area.

For this reason, in v. 2 God commands Israel to bring complete destruction upon these Canaanite nations, “When the LORD your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally.” See the phrase “you must destroy them totally.” The Hebrew word "herem" which is used here is very difficult to translate. It literally means to exclude, to set apart for a specific purpose. It is often used in the book of Leviticus to refer to a whole burnt offering. There it refers to a sacrifice that has been completely devoted to God. Here in Deuteronomy, God tells Israel to completely set aside these nations for the purpose of God’s judgment—to utterly destroy them.

Quarantine

This Hebrew impression is very similar to our concept of quarantine. In a quarantine, a certain area is set aside for a special purpose. Usually, this is because this area has been contaminated by some sort of pollution. We quarantine an area making it off-limits to healthy people because if they were to enter the area the contamination would be greatly hazardous to their health. When I was growing up in the Scottsbluff-Gering area, there once was a severe train wreck in Scottsbluff that required the authorities to evacuate the whole northwestern end of town. Evidently, this train was carrying Benzene, a chemical that was somewhat hazardous to human health. Instantly that whole area was quarantined. Nobody could enter it. Nobody could go home to gather their possessions. It was off-limits until qualified people with the right equipment were able to enter to clean it up. Until the contamination was removed, the area was a threat to human life.

In the same way, the land of Canaan had been contaminated by a wicked, pagan culture. If left untreated, the area was hazardous to Israel’s spiritual health. We can see this idea very clearly in Leviticus 18. In this chapter, God forbids several different gross sexual sins. He tells Israel:

Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the aliens living you must not do any of these detestable things, for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you (Lev. 24-28).

In other words, God tells His people that the Canaanites had, spiritually speaking, polluted the land. It was defiled. If left untreated, the land was dangerous to spiritual well-being. Thus, God decided to quarantine the area—to set it aside for complete destruction in order to purify the area. Notice how He warns Israel that if they follow in the ways of the Canaanites, He would do the same thing to them that He did to the Canaanites. They would be vomited out of the land just like the Canaanites.

Sin Insults God

This will not make sense to us unless we realize why sin demands God’s judgment. Sin is an insult to God's glory. God is the most precious, most beautiful being in all of existence. He is the essence of love, the wellspring of joy, and the foundation of justice. We were made to know God and to delight in Him. This will bring us the most joy and satisfaction in life. Sin robs us this joy that we were made for. And more importantly, sin robs God of His glory. For this reason, God has to pour out His judgment on sin.

The Means of the Ban

In Deuteronomy 7, Moses instructs Israel on how this quarantine is to be carried out. He says:

Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy. Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, for they will turn your sons away from following me to serve other gods, and the LORD's anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you. This is what you are to do to them: Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones, cut down their Asherah poles and burn their idols in the fire (Deut. 7:2b-5).

There were basically four parts to the quarantine: no treaties, no mercy, no intermarriage, no idols. Now each of these four parts needs to be understood and qualified within the context of the book of Joshua. Joshua shows us how the quarantine was actually carried out. From the book of Joshua, we can see that there was actually an exception to the rule. Now how do we know that? Primarily, from the story of Rahab. Here we see how the Israelites let Rahab and her family live even through they were Canaanites. Nowhere in the Bible do we find out that what they did was wrong. In fact, the Bible overwhelmingly approves of the fact that Joshua showed mercy to Rahab. Rahab was a Canaanite prostitute that finds grace in the midst of the destruction of the city of Jericho. And later, we find out that she marries an Israelite man. (That shows us that the command to intermarry for religious reasons and not ethnic.) Not only that, but she is mentioned in the genealogy of Jesus and is praised for her faith in the book of James.

The Only Exception

So what was the exception to the quarantine? Repentance from sin and faith in the LORD God and in His covenant promises. If a Canaanite turned from this wicked, pagan religion and trusted in the LORD God and His covenantal promises, he would find mercy and grace and become part of God’s covenant people—Israel.

God Is Still the Same

The same is still true today. People live in complete rebellion toward God. They worship things like money, sex, and worldly possessions. This is too idolatry and God is still righteous in His judgment of sin. Romans 6:23 tells us that “the wages of sin is death” and as long someone continues to reject God, to reject Jesus, and refuses to turn from their sins, that individual deserves God’s judgment. There will be no mercy for those who love sin and hate God. There is only one exception, and that’s Jesus Christ. Jesus said, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). When someone turns from his sin and embraces Jesus Christ as his Savior and Treasure, that person will find grace and mercy in God’s covenant people.

Chosen to Worship

So God command Israel to quarantine this area by setting it apart for destruction and for His judgment. The area was contaminated by this wicked, sexually immoral culture. The Israelites were to make no treaties, to show no mercy, to not intermarry, and to destroy all Canaanite idols. God did not want them to have anything to do with pagan culture. He knew that if they did not quarantine this wicked religion, it would contaminate them. That is why Moses tells Israel:

For you are a people holy to the LORD your God. The LORD your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession. The LORD did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were more numerous than other peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples. But it was because the LORD loved you and kept the oath he swore to your forefathers that he brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the land of slavery, from the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt. Know therefore that the LORD your God is God; he is the faithful God, keeping his covenant of love to a thousand generations of those who love him and keep his commands. But those who hate him he will repay to their face by destruction; he will not be slow to repay to their face those who hate him (Deut. 7:6-10).

The Israelites were God’s chosen people. They were special. They were to set apart to be holy, to worship and have a relationship with the living God. They were God’s treasured possession. And since they were God’s special people, they were made to worship God and to delight in Him. Although this quarantine called for extreme measures, Israel needed to do this in order to avoid contamination. The area had been polluted, spiritually speaking, by the sinful practices of the Canaanites. Therefore, God was righteous in pouring out His justice against the Canaanites in order to purify the land.

Sorrow over the Death of the Wicked

When I was about ten years old, one day my dad checked out the book Old Yeller from the Gering Public Library. It was one of his favorite stories. Every time we watch a movie with my parents, my dad will tell us that he likes movies could really happen. Movies like Old Yeller or It’s a Wonderful Life. Well, one Saturday, my dad spent the whole day reading Old Yeller to my siblings and me. We just loved the story. What I remember most from the story is the discovery that Old Yeller has rabies and has to die. Travis, the teenage boy in the story, ends up having to shoot his beloved dog and burn his body so that rabies does not spread throughout the area. Although it deeply grieved Travis’ heart to destroy his dog, he knew that if they did not destroy the dog, the rabies would endanger the family.

In the same way, I’m sure that God felt the same sort of sorrow in His decision to judge the Canaanites. He created these people. He made them for the purpose of worshiping Him and delighting in Him. However, instead having a relationship with the one true God, they turned to idols and gross sinful sexual behavior. As God says in Ezekiel, “’Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked?’ declares the Sovereign LORD. ‘Rather, am I not pleased when they turn from their ways and live?’” (Ez. 18:23). However, now God had to judge the Canaanites. They had consistently rejected God. And their godless religion and wicked culture were hazardous and dangerous to anyone else. Although it must have grieved God’s heart to do so, He had put a ban on them—they needed to be completely destroyed.

We can see this at the very beginning when God first promises this land to Abraham in Genesis 15. In this crucial chapter, God promises Abraham that He is going to make him a great nation and that He’s going to give him the land of Canaan and that He’s going to bless the entire world through his descendants. Look at v. 13-16:

Then the LORD said to him, "Know for certain that your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own, and they will be enslaved and mistreated four hundred years. But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will come out with great possessions. You, however, will go to your fathers in peace and be buried at a good old age. In the fourth generation your descendants will come back here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure (Gen. 15:13-16).

This is very important. Here God tells Abraham that before he receives the Promised Land of Canaan some things must happen first. His family must first be held captive in Egypt for hundred years. After that, they would come back to possess the land of Canaan. Now God does not just give Abraham the land right then. And one of the reasons that God gives Abraham for this is that “the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure.” Throughout the Old Testament, the word “Amorites” is synonymous with the word “Canaanites.” In other words, God is still giving the Canaanites time. He could have destroyed them right then, but their sin was not full measure yet. They deserved judgment right and there, but instead He gives them four generations.

God in the Dock

This makes me wonder how much time God has given us. Are we taking advantage of the opportunities that God has extended to us to repent and change our ways? Often when we read stories in the Bible about God judging people for their sins, we think, “Wow! That is really harsh. God is so mean.” Instead, we should think, “Wow! God is really holy. Sin is such an insult to the character of God.” Stories of God’s judgment should prompt us to repent. They should drive us to our knees before a holy God. However, some people would rather think of themselves as being the judge of God. God is on trial. Listen to this brilliant quote by C.S. Lewis.

The ancient man approached God…as the accused person approaches his judge. For the modern man the roles are reversed. He is the judge: God in the dock. He is quite a kindly judge: if God should have a reasonable defense for being the god who permits war, poverty, and disease, he is ready to listen to it. The trial may even end in God’s acquittal. But the important thing is that man is on the bench and God is in the dock.

Oh! How arrogant we can be! How could we think that we could be more loving than the God, who is love? How could we think that we could be more just than the very Being who defines justice? Instead of questioning God’s justice, we should fall to our knees before a holy God in need of His grace.

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Sola Scriptura?

Since my friend Levi has been asking questions about sola scriptura and church tradition lately, I thought that I would think out loud as I considered his thoughts. Really this is a question of revelation. How does God reveal Himself to us? How has God revealed Himself to us in the past? Well, this is a really difficult question. I think that it's important to notice that God reveals truth to us in many different ways. Here are a few of the ways.

First, God reveals Himself through creation. Psalm 19 proclaims that the heavens declare the glory of God. Theologians call this natural revelation. This, of course, is a most unfortunate name. There is nothing natural about it. It is truly supernatural. Last August I decided to spend more time outdoors this year to see what I could learn about God. Hurrah for Chadron State Park. Creation's beauty points to my Creator's beauty. This is why math, science, language, and the arts are important for the Christian to study. They, as a part of God's creation, teach us of what He is like.

Second, God reveals Himself throughHis Spirit. As we study natural revelation, we begin to notice how limited it is. For instance, what's God's name? Is He nice? I wonder if He needs me. Creation doesn't tell us that sort of thing. I first noticed this when I studied philosophy at CSC. Natural theology is very limited in telling us about God. Philosophers of religion spend most of their lives debating whether philosophical proofs for God's existence like the cosmological, teleological, and ontological arguments even work. We need more. We need special revelation.

This is where the Holy Spirit comes. The Spirit reveals truth to us that we wouldn't know otherwise. And as such, the Holy Spirit's revelation is quite superior to natural revelation. I think that might be what Paul was getting at in 1 Cor. 1-2. Wisdom, natural theology, is only helpful for so much. Information from the Spirit is needed to change a man's life. The Spirit uses several different means of revealing truth to us. He uses the Bible, as His God-breathed message. And He uses His church, a Spirit-filled community, to teach us about Himself.

The difficulty comes when we consider the relationship between the Bible and the church. This is difficult because the church doesn't always agree on the message of the Bible. I think that this might be where natural revelation comes back into the picture. Hermeuntics is the science of how to study the Bible. In being a science, it would be classified as natural revelation. Hermeuntics examines the nature of communication. This is helpful because the Bible is a communication between different individuals, a communication that God was carefully involved in. Literature often works in many standard ways. These needed to be study carefully within the church as natural revelation and then applied by the church to the study of Scripture.

Well, that's kinda where I'm at when it comes to the subject of revelation. Any thoughts?